For those not paying attention to the Non-Legion Comics Trivia Thread (and shame on you if you aren't), I am currently running an EXCITING and CHALLENGING question about the characters that were included on DC's 50th Anniversary portrait in 1985, each one drawn by a different prominent comic book artist (think the cover of LoSH #300).
As has already been revealed in that thread, one of the characters on the portrait (and the only Legion character) is the White Witch.
It's pretty odd that Kid Quantum II and Karate Kid are both absent from the poster, yet they joined up before Thunder.
IIRC, they intended to bring Thunder in earlier, but there were some co-ordination problems with Power of Shazam, and they had to wait for Ordway to set it up.
Thanks for the info. That makes me think about the presence of Wildfire and of one of Lori Morning's Dial H personalities (Slipstream) on the poster. Wonder if there were plans to bring either of them in earlier, too.
Thanks for the info. That makes me think about the presence of Wildfire and of one of Lori Morning's Dial H personalities (Slipstream) on the poster. Wonder if there were plans to bring either of them in earlier, too.
Lori got the dial in Legionnaires #47/LSH #91 (although we weren't shown what she was holding at the end in that issue), #48-50 were Mordru, "Slipstream" appeared in the poster in Lgs #50, and in a story in Lgs #53 - where #51 & #52 were Mordru epilogues! (#51 was the literal clear-up from the fight. ending with Vi suddenly growing giant, and #52 was them trying to sort that out, Brande scanning her and her becoming LeViathan). So I'll go with "nope".
As for "Wildfire"... that thingamajig is not picked out in any way in the key, even with a ??? like Slipstream. [And I'm pretty sure Triad-Neutral and Purple are coloured back to front!]
My views are my own and do not reflect those of everyone else... and I wouldn't have it any other way.
The timing is suspect though - slipping in the thingamajig in the poster in L*50 makes me think they at least some concept of where to take the intertwined energies of Atom'x and Blast-Off.
As for Blacula's question...
Um, Steve Lightle? (Somehow I think thothkins has already gotten it right!)
Just a thought, but is it because she's a magic based character? I'd need to dig it out, but there was a brief Legion bit of the Books of Magic. John Bolton? or Paul Johnson? Charles Vess! Charles Vess! I forget the other one...
"...not having to believe in a thing to be interested in it and not having to explain a thing to appreciate the wonder of it."
CLUE #1: This artist has, as far as I know, NEVER worked on a Legion comic! CLUE #2: This artist has won multiple Harvey and Eisner awards. CLUE #3: This artist started in comics in 1972. CLUE #4: This artist is from Wellsville, Ohio. CLUE #5: This artist has done more work for Marvel than DC but is primarily known for their indy work... and a certain Vertigo series. CLUE #6: This artist was the first mainstream comic book creator to come out as openly gay.
If people are Googling then I'm sure those will be enough clues to find the answer.
So weird that, out of all the Legion characters (and even DC characters), he chose the White Witch for this portrait. I wonder if he was asked to draw a Legion character and chose her because of his association with magicy types of books, or if he's just a big Mysa fan?
He does have an extensive background in magical fiction, but perhaps he's also a fan of Mysa's since he chose her over other magical characters not already represented
Could also be that he was just fascinated with her look.
The question:
When the Postboot Legion went to the beach, 7 Legionnaires were absent. Who were they?
Woot! I'm not entirely sure which of them falls into what category. I had Brainy as being the busy one around the HQ, but he could just have easily said "No" outright and stayed in the lab.
Thunder for visiting family, as I think I've read her leaving issue.
I'll have a think about the others, unless someone can take another guess
"...not having to believe in a thing to be interested in it and not having to explain a thing to appreciate the wonder of it."