0 members (),
39
Murran Spies, and
1
robot. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Previous Thread |
|
Next Thread
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 710
Active
|
Active
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 710 |
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 29,461
Time Trapper
|
Time Trapper
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 29,461 |
Originally posted by Iam Legion: As of Legion of Super-Heroes Annual #2 (vol. 2) the '6 Minute War' took place on Durla sometime durring the age of the ancient Greeks. As of Adventure Comics #516 the '6 Minute War' took place on NEW Durla sometime in the future. Also, the events of the story from LSH Annual #2 couldn't have happened as depicted any way since the group of Legionnaires stranded in the past in that story got there because of hitting a temporal wave caused by Superboy time-traveling on his own. The realy odd thing here is that both stories were written by Mr. Levitz so it is Levitz contradicting Levitz. so what? It's not like that annual really mattered in the grand scheme of things. I doubt he considers it one of his finest; it came off more like a throw-away idea.
The childhood friend Exnihil never had.
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520
Active
|
OP
Active
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520 |
Originally posted by Kent: It's not like that annual really mattered in the grand scheme of things. First of all, the issue was full of little retcons/mistakes like that. Contradicting one obscure story isn't that big a deal; contradicting many obscure and not-so-obscure stories adds up to death by a thousand cuts. Second, small retcons can add up over time too. If every story for the next couple of years only contradicted one obscure reference, Legion history would be nonsense by the time it was all over.
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520
Active
|
OP
Active
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520 |
Originally posted by Iam Legion: You might want to add that the story from Adventure #516 also states that Brande hired a 'big deal xenologist' to design a form that would make Durlans seem 'safe' to others and yet allow them to use their powers quickly and easily.... and yet .... Their 'designer/defualt' form looks exactly like current day shape-shifting Durlans and the pre-war (presumably non-shape-shifting) Durlans from the bottled City. Added...
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 710
Active
|
Active
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 710 |
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520
Active
|
OP
Active
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520 |
Edited again to mention Dream Girl's connection to the Dreaming.
You know, as I think about it it seems more and more that the Johns run was full of stuff that we'd be better off without and that it only seems sensible because it was better than not having the original Legion at all.
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 29,461
Time Trapper
|
Time Trapper
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 29,461 |
Originally posted by Iam Legion: Originally posted by Kent: so what? It's not like that annual really mattered in the grand scheme of things.
I doubt he considers it one of his finest; it came off more like a throw-away idea.
Throw-away idea? You mean like the very first appearance of the Legion of Super-Heroes was?not quite. no one seems to have ever clamored for the return of the Durlan Greek gods. Or for any revisiting of that story at all.
The childhood friend Exnihil never had.
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 29,461
Time Trapper
|
Time Trapper
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 29,461 |
Originally posted by Ken Arromdee: Originally posted by Kent: [b] It's not like that annual really mattered in the grand scheme of things. First of all, the issue was full of little retcons/mistakes like that. Contradicting one obscure story isn't that big a deal; contradicting many obscure and not-so-obscure stories adds up to death by a thousand cuts.
Second, small retcons can add up over time too. If every story for the next couple of years only contradicted one obscure reference, Legion history would be nonsense by the time it was all over.[/b]seems like almost every issue from the 1970s, actually. And Legion managed to get through that okay. I look at comics lore like Arthurian lore: written by too many hands to be fully consistent, and the inconsistencies/flaws are part of the cannon. To me, it's better to appreciate the gist of the mythos than try to iron out the wrinkles. but I've been the anal-continuity freak at various times (I mean that in fond nostalgia, not any dis), so I both respect and am amused by this project.
The childhood friend Exnihil never had.
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 574
Active
|
Active
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 574 |
Adventure #12 says that Superboy is from the 20th Century but the Legion is from the 31st. If the Legion takes place exactly 1000 years after Superboy's time, this can't be true. Probably a mistake. IIRC Legion stories (Adventure to Volume 3 era) have always been 1000 years after date they were published give or take a month or two.
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 710
Active
|
Active
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 710 |
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 741
Active
|
Active
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 741 |
When DC stated that this was the original Legion, I doubt very much that the statement was meant to include every detail from the silver age Earth One. Original Legion meant Bouncing Boy to Quislet.
When you look at the Flash, Green Lantern or Superman, all of these characters' backgrounds have been greatly changed since the silver age but they are still touted as the original silver-age heroes. The DCU has moved on and that movement has affected the Legion just like all the other characters. Large chunks of the changes to Barry Allen, Hal Jordan and the Superman family are down to the tinkering of Geoff Johns so we should expect the Legion to suffer similarly, just as the Legion suffered for John Byrne's changes to Superman in the 80s.
Try to imagine if there had been no 5YL, reboot or threeboot. Would the current tweaks have been acceptable twenty years ago. Are they any worse than the pocket universe Superboy for example?
Many of the changes are unnecessary and irritate the hell out of me but this is still the Legion of Mr & Mrs Ranzz, Mr & Mrs Taine, Tellus, Quislet and all the other little pieces that made me love the Legion all those years ago.
"Our devotion to each other was unexplainable" "You were kids" "No Batman, we were Legion"
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,457
Wanderer
|
Wanderer
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,457 |
Originally posted by Silver Age Lad: When DC stated that this was the original Legion, I doubt very much that the statement was meant to include every detail from the silver age Earth One. Original Legion meant Bouncing Boy to Quislet.
When you look at the Flash, Green Lantern or Superman, all of these characters' backgrounds have been greatly changed since the silver age but they are still touted as the original silver-age heroes. The DCU has moved on and that movement has affected the Legion just like all the other characters. Large chunks of the changes to Barry Allen, Hal Jordan and the Superman family are down to the tinkering of Geoff Johns so we should expect the Legion to suffer similarly, just as the Legion suffered for John Byrne's changes to Superman in the 80s.
Try to imagine if there had been no 5YL, reboot or threeboot. Would the current tweaks have been acceptable twenty years ago. Are they any worse than the pocket universe Superboy for example?
Many of the changes are unnecessary and irritate the hell out of me but this is still the Legion of Mr & Mrs Ranzz, Mr & Mrs Taine, Tellus, Quislet and all the other little pieces that made me love the Legion all those years ago. You worded that perfectly. I couldn't agree more!
Touch the magic...
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520
Active
|
OP
Active
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520 |
Originally posted by Silver Age Lad: When DC stated that this was the original Legion, I doubt very much that the statement was meant to include every detail from the silver age Earth One. Original Legion meant Bouncing Boy to Quislet. ... Try to imagine if there had been no 5YL, reboot or threeboot. Would the current tweaks have been acceptable twenty years ago. Are they any worse than the pocket universe Superboy for example? I think that the statement could be interpreted as "we're going to keep as much as reasonably possible". This does not mean that they have to keep Cosmic Boy's magnetic eyes, or every story where the Legion plays a prank on some 20th century person. But I don't think it's unreasonable to interpret that as "we're not doing a whole bunch of gratuitous retconning all at once".
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 40,645
Trap Timer
|
Trap Timer
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 40,645 |
Part of the problem is that one person's obscure trivial plot point is another person's vital bit of classic Legion lore.
It does amuse me that people who complain about arbitrary deviations from old school Legion continuity are called "anal-continuity freaks" while the changes are almost always excused under the banner of "Well, the rest of the DCU has changed, so we've got to expect that the Legion will have to be altered to conform with every other comic DC is publishing at the moment."
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 34,634
Bold Flavors
|
Bold Flavors
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 34,634 |
I just reread the first post to see how far we've gotten. Very good stuff, Ken! Maybe by the 12 issue (end of Levitz first year) you could do a full-on summary of all inconsistencies, deleting all mistakes, fixes and unimportant things (like statues). There could be an annual update of that, and you can keep the first post of this thread going the way it is now so its kind of like the Master List. Er, that is, if you don't mind me making more work for you. I actually think we have a really firm handle on continuity at this point. Other than Countdown, which no one clearly intends on ever addressing, things aren't quite as messy as someone would think at first.
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520
Active
|
OP
Active
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520 |
Not all of the list is about inconsistencies in the first place, like the Tornado Twins/XS stuff (which was from your original list), or the list of retcons.
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 34,634
Bold Flavors
|
Bold Flavors
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 34,634 |
Oh, I know. I think you've done a great job!
I'm just curious about how much Paul can actually resolve in one year's time.
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520
Active
|
OP
Active
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520 |
Added the 52 Devem and moved Dev-Em back to "up in the air".
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520
Active
|
OP
Active
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520 |
Added explanation for the Superboy date error in Adventure Comics.
Is there any way we can pin the thread? Sooner or later I'm going to run out of changes to make.
Edit: also added Inferno and Sun Girl and changed the 5YL section to an other continuities section so Dr. Aven could be put there. And the Kyle Rayner reboot crossover.
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 581
Active
|
Active
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 581 |
hmmmm...wonders if Inferno is still in the 21st century...
Bring back the super-cousins
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520
Active
|
OP
Active
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520 |
Added:
Blok in Adventure #4
Element Lad scene from Adventure #1 was shown
Moved V6 inconsistencies into separate section from pre-V6 inconsistencies
Levitz's remarks on Ayla/Vi from SDCC interview
Anything else I missed from Adventure? (or were any of the other scenes at the end of Adventure #1 shown?)
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 710
Active
|
Active
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 710 |
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520
Active
|
OP
Active
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520 |
I think undoing the Lanoth thing is the first one of those.
At any rate, Adventure #517 has its own problems, so I've added it twice, once as un-retconning Superman: Secret Origin and once as adding retcons. I made a long post on the DC board complaining about retcons that supposedly don't change anything we actually saw. It's a shame that the list now has an "intentional retcon--during V6" section.
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 581
Active
|
Active
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 581 |
i wonder if the flight belt thing was an artist remembering what originally took place and got it drawn up and it was too late to change it back to rings post production...(no one wants their legion books to be late do they?) ...not that a mistake like that is acceptable but tolerable if it switches back.
Bring back the super-cousins
|
|
|
Re: The Complete Continuity Match-Up Checklist: from Baxter to Levitz Relaunch (revised)
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 710
Active
|
Active
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 710 |
|
|
|
Forums14
Topics21,065
Posts1,050,197
Legionnaires1,731
|
Most Online53,886 Jan 7th, 2024
|
|
Posts: 458
Joined: December 2003
|
|
|
|