|
0 members (),
40
Murran Spies, and
2
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
 Previous Thread |
|
Next Thread 
|
|
 Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 29,248
Time Trapper
|
OP
Time Trapper
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 29,248 |
Yeah, Nighty, that caption really sells it.  Sorry, the whole thing just irks me! 
Still "Lardy" to my friends!
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 29,248
Time Trapper
|
|
OP
Time Trapper
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 29,248 |
Originally posted by Triplicate Kid:
It seems (was it earlier on this very thread that it was pointed out?) that most 5YL fans consider it a retcon, and most of its detractors consider it a reboot. So a "retcon" argument can (I won't say should) be taken as a defense of 5YL. Okay, I'm gonna officially retract my earlier assertion that the PU Superboy "fix" was a reboot. It was definitely a retcon--a very, VERY damaging retcon--but a retcon, nonetheless. I will not back off, however, from my assertion that the Superboy retcon was the first domino to fall which allowed all the further butchering of Legion continuity and reboots possible in the first place. The 5YL characters were the same characters as before, but admittedly, you had to fudge a lot of details in their history to make it work. Again, I'd like to point to LSH #5 (Volume 4/5YL) and commend it for the way it handled cutting Superboy out. At least we had a story with an in-continuity explanation for the changes. It was lovingly crafted and, IMO, one of the very best Legion stories ever written, even considering what it had to do. If you're being forced to retcon something out, it was nice that TMK crafted a beautiful story to give the old continuity an appropriate sendoff. I don't know if many can look at that story who loved Superboy, knowing the damage it did to the continuity, and still recognize it as a great achievement. I, for one, can.
Still "Lardy" to my friends!
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 33,081
Time Trapper
|
|
Time Trapper
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 33,081 |
I don't see why they couldn't... TMK were doing what the bonehead then-dictators at DC were FORCING them to do, not what THEY wanted to do...
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 851
Active
|
|
Active
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 851 |
Originally posted by Lard Lad: Originally posted by Triplicate Kid:
[b]It seems (was it earlier on this very thread that it was pointed out?) that most 5YL fans consider it a retcon, and most of its detractors consider it a reboot. So a "retcon" argument can (I won't say should) be taken as a defense of 5YL.
I will not back off, however, from my assertion that the Superboy retcon was the first domino to fall which allowed all the further butchering of Legion continuity and reboots possible in the first place.
The 5YL characters were the same characters as before, but admittedly, you had to fudge a lot of details in their history to make it work.
Again, I'd like to point to LSH #5 (Volume 4/5YL) and commend it for the way it handled cutting Superboy out. At least we had a story with an in-continuity explanation for the changes. It was lovingly crafted and, IMO, one of the very best Legion stories ever written, even considering what it had to do. If you're being forced to retcon something out, it was nice that TMK crafted a beautiful story to give the old continuity an appropriate sendoff.
I don't know if many can look at that story who loved Superboy, knowing the damage it did to the continuity, and still recognize it as a great achievement. I, for one, can. [/b]I think you nailed it, Lard Boy. While Triplicate Kid summarized it perfectly, he still left the idea that 5YL was a retcon as an opinion, while for me this is not an opinion. It is a fact. And Lard Boy gave the best answer as to why: because they tried to make it work without disregarding history. You may hate it and say it didn't work well. But you can't deny there was a palette of 30+ years in the background. As for when things started to crumble, then it might be an opinion. For some, it was the Pocket Universe, for others it was the 5YL itself. For me, it was Legion On The Run, but that's because I am not a ultra master continuity buff. I like stories and I like development. LOTR was the opposite. And, being it an awful piece of trash, all retcons and partial reboots wouldn't help it. And, as we just saw, the first "reboot" was Supergirl's presence in LSH!!!
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824
Active
|
|
Active
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824 |
Originally posted by Ricardo: Originally posted by Lard Lad:
[qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Triplicate Kid:
[qb]It seems (was it earlier on this very thread that it was pointed out?) that most 5YL fans consider it a retcon, and most of its detractors consider it a reboot. So a "retcon" argument can (I won't say should) be taken as a defense of 5YL. My point is that the 5YG resides completely within the Post Crisis DC Universe, so therefore they can't be the original which resided in the Pre Crisis DC Universe. Regardless of what any one on the Legion title did. Valor? He was given his name by the Post Crisis Superman...when he was in the 20th century, he was in the 20th Century of the Post Crisis DC Universe. Valor was on a team right there in the Post Crisis DC Universe that was called the L.E.G.I.O.N. Mon-EL wasn't on any team ever called the L.E.G.I.O.N....and he wasn't called Valor either. Brainiac 5? He's not descended from the same guy the Pre Crisis Brainy was...he's descended from the same guy as the ZH Brainy. And the original stories, they did not all happen and even the ones that did, were altered in a way such as they could only have occurred in the Post Crisis DC Universe. After all...the multiverse didn't exist for the 5YG Legion...same as every other Post Crisis character/team. Saying the PU Superboy and 5YG are retcons is like saying the Crisis on Infinite Earths was a retcon. And that's not the original Batman either...it's not even the Silver Age Batman.
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,387
Legionnaire!
|
|
Legionnaire!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,387 |
I know everybody hates LOtR but could it be because the tale was never allowed to run it's course? Zero Hour was a grand fun ride full of historic references and one wierd sprockin' storyline but in the process they threw the Legion away along with whatever ideas the Bierbaums had for our adult Legionnaires.
I've always suspected that they had some greater plan and that it might have been the eventual introduction of the Adult Legion.
I dunno..
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824
Active
|
|
Active
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824 |
Originally posted by MLLASH:
I don't see why they couldn't... TMK were doing what the bonehead then-dictators at DC were FORCING them to do, not what THEY wanted to do... FWIW, I don't blame the Zero Hour crew for what they did either...it's pretty obvious that's what DC wanted all along, the full restart, and the only reason it took as long as it did for it to come about was because Giffen had enough pull to stave off DC's relaunch of continuity. Unfortunately, the damage was done...like I said earilier, it's pretty amazing he even attempted to save it...I'd say he went above and beyond the call of duty on that one. He did a hell of a lot more than Paul Levitz did to save it. No...Giffen definitely tried to save the Legion, he tried to save it's history. Beyond all doubt he tried to save it. Now he tried to save them so he could kill maim or write out about 50% of the original cast(at least on a temporary basis)..and that I didn't like...but that's another argument....and I'll concede that sounds like it too was made worse by corporate meddling.
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824
Active
|
|
Active
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824 |
Originally posted by Ricardo:
Dan Jurgens - and most probably Mark Waid -, who were the "Geoff Johns" of that period, gave LSH a blank sheet with ZH. The idea was to make LSH as big as the X-Men (I remember an interview at that time saying it in those words). They said that they wanted to RETELL some stories, but they wouldn't follow it. This was impossible for 5YL - the maximum they could do was to change some of the characters in a certain story. But never "wipe it out".
That's what I am talking about. It's not a defense of TMK or McCraw. It's a "defense" of what is a reboot and what is a retcon. [/QB] IMO, I don't think Jurgens or Waid wanted to do it. DC wanted it...and they tried to pressure Giffen into doiing it as well...he fought it, but the Superman policy undermined virtually every thing he was trying to do.
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,193
#deleteFacebook
|
|
#deleteFacebook
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,193 |
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.comics.dc.lsh/msg/fe6134cef0d9023a?dmode=source The preboot LSH v4 is what [Giffen] described as "the one story I wish I could have finished up right." The young Batch SW6 would be the real Legion, while the adults would be revealed as clones. He said the "hat trick" rumor is "dead on true": that's where the writers would randomly select some characters (as if drawn from a hat) to die in a massive battle between the old and young teams. The senior team would then leave United Planets space, and call themselves THE OMEGA MEN in their own book. And... Originally posted by Superboy:
IMO, I don't think Jurgens or Waid wanted to do it. DC wanted it...and they tried to pressure Giffen into doiing it as well...he fought it, but the Superman policy undermined virtually every thing he was trying to do. IYO or not... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.comics.misc/msg/ee7ea346a3df0595?dmode=source Waid: "...all the continuity changes and flip-flops have made the Legion's history an unsalvageable mess. Continuity wasn't "in bad shape." It was Chernobyl. This revision wasn't a decision made lightly; KC Carlson and Tom McCraw and I spent literally hundreds of man-hours over the past year trying to come up with a less drastic solution to the continuity problems than simply wiping the slate clean, and we could *not find one.* [...] I'm sorry if I sound cranky, but this wasn't an editorial fiat from DC. This drastic change was my choice, and DC chose to back me."
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 851
Active
|
|
Active
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 851 |
Originally posted by Superboy: Originally posted by Ricardo:
Dan Jurgens - and most probably Mark Waid -, who were the "Geoff Johns" of that period, gave LSH a blank sheet with ZH. The idea was to make LSH as big as the X-Men (I remember an interview at that time saying it in those words). They said that they wanted to RETELL some stories, but they wouldn't follow it. This was impossible for 5YL - the maximum they could do was to change some of the characters in a certain story. But never "wipe it out".
That's what I am talking about. It's not a defense of TMK or McCraw. It's a "defense" of what is a reboot and what is a retcon. Zero Hour was built considering that whatever came after Crisis did not solve the "complications" within DC Comics. Giffen was long gone - in fact, I believe he was out of comics altogether at that point (his JLI was history and he had left LSH 2 years earlier). Byrne had also left quite a while before. So, no, I don't think it was the same thing at all.
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824
Active
|
|
Active
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824 |
In my heart, I want all Legion fans to resent John Byrne as much as I do for what happened to this book...so with that in mind... We'll let Johnnyboy speak for himself: http://www.byrnerobotics.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=13027&PN=0&TPN=2 John Byrne's own comments:
Most folk 'round these parts know I have no fondness for the Legion. I was "present at conception", having read the story that introduced them when it was first published. My younger self -- often the butt of cruel tricks played by the other kids at school -- instantly hated these punks from the future for the trick they played on Superboy. My older self has never quite been able to get over it.
I have other reasons for disliking the Legion, tho. I have watched as they became almost the Poster People for things that have gone wrong in comics over the past several decades. As characters introduced as kids barely into their teens turned into Babes and Hunks, and started getting all grim and matrimonial. For a series set in the future, and therefore not bound in any way to real time, this is absolutely absurd. But, of course, it's hard to draw realistic kids, and much more fun to draw chicks with big hooters Here's this fool explaining why the Legion as no longer popular...completely ignoring the fact that his retcon is the reason: The Legion has the same problem. Science Fiction has its followers, and I count myself as one of them, but I would not want a steady diet of science fiction set only in the 30th Century. Every so often I need something I can connect to more directly. The Legion rarely provides this. Fine, for people who like that sort of thing. But not really a foundation on which a long-standing franchise could be built. (Would you be reading Superman's adventures today, if he'd stayed on Krypton and gotten the same powers? Truth, justice, and the Kryptonian Way?) #$%#$% you eliminated their come back to Earth aspect...Superman was their trip home. You eliminated it...and then you killed even the partial trip home, and then you killed the entire planet or should I say Pocket Universe that was "home". Still not enough of Johnny Boy? Here are some more choice comments about the Legion and it's fans:
Even if I liked the Legion, I don't think I would be much interested in doing the series on any kind of regular basis. It's nothing like the way I see "the Future" -- plus Legion fans are among the most anal ------ I mean, the most devoted on the planet. Working on a Legion series would be, well, work!
Here's @zzhat again showing that he just doesn't get it:
Big problem for me, with a series like the Legion, is that it is unconnected from the rest of the "universe
%@#$%@#%...you disconnected it from the rest of the Universe... Seriously...this dude is the stupidest dude to ever write a comic...the 9 year olds in the Adventure Letter Columns were smarter. I digress...
I can watch -- and thoroughly enjoy -- a movie like STAR WARS or a TV series like STAR TREK, which are separated from the world I know by time, space, and a lot of other things shared by the Legion --- but the difference is what I am watching in SW and ST is actors -- human beings -- who provide the "bridge" that allows me to connect with the characters. Both series have been animated, and as moving drawings, both series have left me cold. (Is it just a coincidence no STAR TREK comic book has ever really taken off?)
Set in the future, the Legion lacks, for me, the kind of eviceral link that other superhero stories have. This is why the only time the Legion has come even close to working for me was when they were occasional guest stars in Superboy stories.
So why did you remove Superboy then you #@$%#@$%@$#?
I've mentioned, tho, that it was not just that they were mean to Superboy that put me off the Legion. That undoubtedly stacked the deck, but as a child who liked a degree of order in the universe, I did not like it when they began alternating with Bizarro in ADVENTURE COMICS (especially since they kept the Bizarro artist, not one of my favorites) and picked up their own part of the letter column with what struck me as the very bad title of "Bits of Legionnaire Business", an awkward "twist" on "Bits of Bizarro Business".
Face it -- for me, the Legion was strictly D.O.A.*
*In one of those "What Were They Thinking??" moments, the editors managed to dig the Legion's grave even deeper for me, when, in SUPERMAN 149, "The Death of Superman", they chose to show Legionnair's passing by Superman's casket to "pay their respects" after Luthor kills him. "You bastards," I thought, in suitable early Sixties kid language, "you knew this was going to happen! Why didn't you tell him!!"
And that was just an "Imaginary Story".
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824
Active
|
|
Active
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824 |
And just so we're clear on who's idea it was: http://www.byrnerobotics.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=19894&KW=Superboy&PN=0&TPN=3
Oh, a question for JB: why did powers-that-be at DC want to ditch Superboy from the mythos back in the 1980's?
••
JB: That was my idea.
His solution for the Legion at that time?: http://www.byrnerobotics.com/FAQ/listing.asp?ID=2&T1=Questions+about+Comic+Book+Projects#143
How did the Superboy/Legion/Time Trapper arc come about?
JB: One of the central points of my "back to the basics" approach to the Superman reboot was that he began his career as an adult -- so no Superboy. This, I knew, would have a rather profound effect on the Legion, whose history was tied directly to Superboy, and at several editorial meetings I brought up this point often, suggesting different ways in which it could be dealt with. (Several times I referenced a book I'd had as a kid called "Young Robin Hood". This told the adventures of Robin, Marion, Little John, et al when they were all around 10 years old, and long, long before they "actually" met. I suggested the Legion had formed based on legends of Superman's adventures as a boy -- adventures the Legion members would be surprised to discover had not actually happened.) I was told, basically "don't worry, we have it all figured out!"
Then about six months into the project I got a panicked call from the Superman editor: "This reboot messes up the Legion!!"
"Yes? I thought we all understood this?"
"No! My god! We have to do something!!" And thus was born the Pocket Universe and the story that "explained" the Legion's Superboy connection.
Translation: He wanted to reboot the Legion And finally...we come a full circle, and even John Byrne admits it was a bad idea:
Why did JB remove Superboy from continuity with the MAN OF STEEL reboot?
JB: There's hardly a job out there that I would not tweak in some way if I could. As you may know, I dumped Superboy from the Superman mythos largely because I did not see him as a necessary character, and DC had agreed to allow me to show Superman "learning the ropes" after the reboot. Unfortunately, once the contracts were signed, the backed down on this and insisted we do MAN OF STEEL so that Superman would be "up to speed" by the time the new first issue came out. (Eventually I would realize that they wanted Superman rebooted without him actually being, you know, rebooted. Odd, indeed, since I had said from the start I was prefectly prepared to work from within continuity, and the reboot was their idea.) So, since I did not have a Superman who was still "figuring it out", I wish I had had Superboy to fill that role. (2/21/2005)
And yeah...the PU Superboy story that rendered the entire Legion morons was also his idea. Want to know why I am much more optimistic about Johns that anything that came before? Because Johns has a brain...Byrne does not. Byrne considered the most third most successful Superhero in Comics history at that time, as a meaningless character. Giffen didn't do this...he's not that stupid. Waid actually went after Byrne at a comic con one time for what he did. Waid didn't do it either. My most fervent wish is that Byrne spends the rest of his career doing nothing but comissions for Adventure Era Legion fans. If he wasn't stupid...none of this would have happened. DC wass stupid too? DC aren't Legion fans...DC didn't realize what was going to happenthey don't pay attention to the Legion...Byrne by his own words did, he kenw exactly what it was going to do...he deserves the scorn he gets from Legion Fans.
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824
Active
|
|
Active
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824 |
Originally posted by Ricardo: Originally posted by Superboy: [b] Originally posted by Ricardo:
Dan Jurgens - and most probably Mark Waid -, who were the "Geoff Johns" of that period, gave LSH a blank sheet with ZH. The idea was to make LSH as big as the X-Men (I remember an interview at that time saying it in those words). They said that they wanted to RETELL some stories, but they wouldn't follow it. This was impossible for 5YL - the maximum they could do was to change some of the characters in a certain story. But never "wipe it out".
That's what I am talking about. It's not a defense of TMK or McCraw. It's a "defense" of what is a reboot and what is a retcon. IMO, I don't think Jurgens or Waid wanted to do it. DC wanted it...and they tried to pressure Giffen into doiing it as well...he fought it, but the Superman policy undermined virtually every thing he was trying to do. [/b] DC brass wanted Giffen to do a full reboot... I posted the comments by Giffen earlier in this thread where he talks about the fact that's what they wanted...they wanted it even after the 5YG book had begun. And that's why much of what he wantd to do was undermined....DC wanted ish #5 of the 5YG to be a complete relaunch.
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 851
Active
|
|
Active
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 851 |
Superboy: I posted the comments by Giffen earlier in this thread where he talks about the fact that's what they wanted...they wanted it even after the 5YG book had begun. And that's why much of what he wantd to do was undermined. I know that, but Zero Hour was pure Dan and Waid. Maybe they did what DC has always wanted to do, but again, it wasn't Byrne or Carlin at all at that point. I don't share so much hate for Byrne. He is definitely a writer above average for me and it is funny he talks like that about LSH when his NextMen project actually started in 2112, a time travel book... As for what he did to LSH, we may hate him forever, but maybe (and now I'll probably anger most people here) if it wasn't for such a narrow palette, TMK wouldn't have had produced such an experimental run. Maybe.
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824
Active
|
|
Active
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824 |
Dan Jurgens is an old school Legion fan...you can see letters from him in old issues of Superboy and the Legion(along with Tom Bierbaum)...it wasn't his idea. He just carried it out.
DC wanted all the stuff fixed or at least restarted, and Jurgens gave them that.
At least what he did makes sense...even if you don't like it.
History was changed and the entire thing started over again.
IT wasn't Waid's idea...it wasn't the Bierbaum's idea. It wadn't Jurgens idea...it wasn't Giffen's idea.
These guys are fans of the original Legion...that's a big reason why they're even in comics.
Those are just the guys with the bullseyes on their foreheads.
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 33,081
Time Trapper
|
|
Time Trapper
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 33,081 |
Supes, I doubt you'll have any trouble finding a bunch of Byrne-bashers in these parts (some especially scathing threads are in the Gym'll forum). The man has proven himself to be an utter nincompoop.
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,193
#deleteFacebook
|
|
#deleteFacebook
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,193 |
Originally posted by Superboy:
IT wasn't Waid's idea... Reposting... Originally posted by Reboot: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.comics.misc/msg/ee7ea346a3df0595?dmode=source Waid: "...all the continuity changes and flip-flops have made the Legion's history an unsalvageable mess. Continuity wasn't "in bad shape." It was Chernobyl. This revision wasn't a decision made lightly; KC Carlson and Tom McCraw and I spent literally hundreds of man-hours over the past year trying to come up with a less drastic solution to the continuity problems than simply wiping the slate clean, and we could *not find one.* [...] I'm sorry if I sound cranky, but this wasn't an editorial fiat from DC. This drastic change was my choice, and DC chose to back me." "This wasn't an editorial fiat from DC. This drastic change was my choice, and DC chose to back me." "This wasn't an editorial fiat from DC. This drastic change was my choice, and DC chose to back me." "This wasn't an editorial fiat from DC. This drastic change was my choice, and DC chose to back me." That's what Waid said at the time.
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824
Active
|
|
Active
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824 |
What gets me is how tread upon this book has been...
You'd think there were only a couple of Legion fans in the world or something...
But Legion Fans have been:
Paul Levitz, the Publisher of DC.
Jim Shooter EIC of Marvel.
Mark Waid, Giffen, Jurgens...guys that have been DC's #1 guy at different times.
George Perez, their top artist for a decade...
These guys were fans of the book just like us...many of them list it as their favorite comic ever.
And it's just been trashed...and sadly, it was a part of the DC Universe that wasn't broken when it was "fixed".
And it just got tread upon...because of the one guy who wasn't a Legion Fan...Mr. John Byrne at the peak of his influence. IF he'd maybe given the slightest bit of thought that there are people that like the Legion, or even listened to his own opinions about what it takes for a title like the Legion to be successful...none of this would have happened.
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824
Active
|
|
Active
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824 |
Originally posted by Reboot: Originally posted by Superboy:
[b]IT wasn't Waid's idea...
Originally posted by Reboot: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.comics.misc/msg/ee7ea346a3df0595?dmode=source Waid: "...all the continuity changes and flip-flops have made the Legion's history an unsalvageable mess. Continuity wasn't "in bad shape." It was Chernobyl. This revision wasn't a decision made lightly; KC Carlson and Tom McCraw and I spent literally hundreds of man-hours over the past year trying to come up with a less drastic solution to the continuity problems than simply wiping the slate clean, and we could *not find one.* [...] I'm sorry if I sound cranky, but this wasn't an editorial fiat from DC. This drastic change was my choice, and DC chose to back me."
"This drastic change was my choice, and DC chose to back me."
"This drastic change was my choice, and DC chose to back me."
That's what Waid said at the time. [/b]Ok so maybe Waid does deserve more blame than I have alloted to him... I'm still skeptical though...because at the time of the 5YG they weren't saying it was due to DC editorial policy either...they were saying it was their decision...but it wasn't, they weren't allowed to use Superboy. Was Waid? That's my point. IF you can't use Superboy, then you can't fix it...that's what Giffen tried to do. It didn't work. Hmmm...maybe he was the "DC" that took Giffen to lunch and wanted the full reboot in ish #5, seeing as how he was the editor...and maybe that's the reason he was off the book when Giffen wouldn't go for it. Either way...he is right, without Superboy the continuity couldn't be salvaged, and I'd argue that the concept of the Legion itself is different, evne with a clean slate, so my ultimate point still remains... A point hammered home when Waid rebooted his own Legion. Hmmm...maybe Waid is more culpable in this than I have considered previously...in a recent word ballon he was complaining about DC's paving over of previously existing continuity...a point made ironic by the fact the paved over the Legion's twice...
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 851
Active
|
|
Active
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 851 |
Originally posted by Superboy:
Dan Jurgens is an old school Legion fan...you can see letters from him in old issues of Superboy and the Legion(along with Tom Bierbaum)...it wasn't his idea. He just carried it out.
DC wanted all the stuff fixed or at least restarted, and Jurgens gave them that.
At least what he did makes sense...even if you don't like it.
History was changed and the entire thing started over again.
IT wasn't Waid's idea...it wasn't the Bierbaum's idea. It wadn't Jurgens idea...it wasn't Giffen's idea.
These guys are fans of the original Legion...that's a big reason why they're even in comics.
Those are just the guys with the bullseyes on their foreheads. Superboy, it is not a matter of hate/love for the Legion. McCraw is the colorist extraordinaire for me - nobody does LSH colors like him, he was obviously a fan but he gave us LOTR. Dan was behind Zero Hour - that's just what I said. I don't question how much love any creator has for the book. This is not questionable. And Waid was the ultimate responsible for rebooting. I don't think he hates LSH for that. I just don't like it at all. DC wants money - not a reboot. Paul Levitz is LSH master and he is Mr. TPTB. The creators come up with something that they think will draw people to the book. Sometimes it is a restart, sometimes it is a creator-name. I think it isn't much simpler than that.
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824
Active
|
|
Active
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824 |
Originally posted by Ricardo:
]Superboy, it is not a matter of hate/love for the Legion. It was for John Byrne. He doesn't like Shooter either. That's why he was at DC to do the Superman revamp.
McCraw is the colorist extraordinaire for me - nobody does LSH colors like him, he was obviously a fan but he gave us LOTR.
Dan was behind Zero Hour - that's just what I said. I don't question how much love any creator has for the book. This is not questionable. And Waid was the ultimate responsible for rebooting. I don't think he hates LSH for that. I just don't like it at all.
DC wants money - not a reboot. Paul Levitz is LSH master and he is Mr. TPTB. The creators come up with something that they think will draw people to the book. Sometimes it is a restart, sometimes it is a creator-name. I think it isn't much simpler than that. [/QB]
You and Reboot IMO, miss the point...these were the guys that were writing it, that were carrying out the task of trying to fix it, but they weren't the ones that broke it...and their failure to fix it, is not because they sucked...it was because they didn't have access to the pieces to fix it.
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824
Active
|
|
Active
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824 |
If someone can prove to me that Jurgens and Waid could have inserted Supermboy back into the continuity, even an all new continuity, I'll concede that they deserve a lionshare of the blame or the Legion's struggle over the past 2 decades.
But last I checked...Superboy wasn;t retconned back into existence in Zero Hour, so therefore whether they started over from scratch, or carried on with the cluster#@%43 5YG continuity, they didn't have the tools to fix it.
It wasn't the same either way.
If anything...seeing as how the Siegel litigation was on the radar in the 90's...I'd say they had even less of a chance of getting that than Giffen.
But you know...I am going to have to reconsider Waid's role in this...I remember before he broke into comics he wrote Legion reviews for Amazing heroes..and I hated those reviews...
Maybe Mark Waid has actually wanted a Superman free Legion all along...maybe that's been his goal for the last 20 years being a part of every reboot, every retcon...to make the Legion his own.
I find this hard to believe...because his favorite Legion story is Adventure 369...the same as mine...and you can't do that story without time travel, without Superboy, smallville etc.
And he was extremely critical of the Byrne revamp. He was the most vocal critic of it among creators.
But maybe, just maybe...he deserves creator infamy second only to Byrne Legion history...
I'll have to research this. Waid is on notice!
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824
Active
|
|
Active
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824 |
Originally posted by MLLASH:
Supes, I doubt you'll have any trouble finding a bunch of Byrne-bashers in these parts (some especially scathing threads are in the Gym'll forum). The man has proven himself to be an utter nincompoop. Cool...I'ma check out that section of the forum. A little Byrne hating always puts me in a good mood :tu
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824
Active
|
|
Active
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 824 |
Originally posted by Reboot:
This wasn't an editorial fiat from DC. This drastic change was my choice, and DC chose to back me."
"This wasn't an editorial fiat from DC. This drastic change was my choice, and DC chose to back me."
"This wasn't an editorial fiat from DC. This drastic change was my choice, and DC chose to back me."
That's what Waid said at the time. [/QB] Sorry Reboot but after carefully re-evaluating what I know(which is considerable), I am going count on your knowledge of your beloved reboot and respond in kind with: White Triangle White Triangle White Triangle Not the Daxamite Supremacists who didn't think anyone was good enough to touch them, not even the Legion......but rather the Krytonian Supremacists, who did't think should be allowed to touch them, not even the Legion: ![[Linked Image]](http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/3345_4_0500.jpg) Think about what the Daxamite White Triangle did, and I am counting on you to be able to recall that better than most...and you'll see the real story told for all who really wanted to know. What Waid couldn't say publicly.. Nope...Waid just tried to fix it in a different way than Giffen, and I'd say he was successful in a way...the continuity made more sense, but the concept was still broken. Waid doesn't get infamy...I know he's a Legion fan. I know he doesn't like what was done to it, he just couldn't say it publicly...because he liked working, and eating... I mean do you really expect any creator at the time they are on a DC book to go after the Editor of their Dream Assignment(Superman)... Beyond that...by ZH I'd say the litigation was a problem... I mean Superboy still hasn't appeared...does anyone doubt Johns wants to bring him back?
|
|
|
Re: Lardy's Roundtable: What must Levitz do to ensure Long Life for the Legion?
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,193
#deleteFacebook
|
|
#deleteFacebook
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,193 |
A Kal-El Superboy appeared years after ZH, in the Hypertension arc of Kon's series (while Kon was universe-hopping, he landed in Ye Olde Smallville for an issue or so). And I've heard that theory. I've also heard that the name came after Lee Moder's costume design for them, which included the triangles. You'll also note that Busiek, in that post (he was involved in the reboot as he wrote the "End of an Era" issues of Valor), said: One of my suggestions was that LEGION #0 retell the origin, and LEGIONNAIRES #0 be a "history book" with each page giving a montage pin-up by a different Legion artist from Swan to Sprouse re-establishing a major Legion story and what happened (and what happened differently, if anything), so the post-Zero issues could pick up with a fully-established Legion with a great deal of history, but it would be a history readers could know and refer back to. The problem was that everyone wanted to pick up the regular continuity at a different time -- the Sun-Eater story, the Great Darkness Saga, the Magic Wars, etc. -- and it was finally decided that it would just work best, if history was to be re-set (and it was _already_ broken, he said again) to explain the re-set right from the start and tell the stories in full. And this is essentially what Johns has now done, of course, in picking up at a point. Without Supergirl in the history, and with numerous other changes including rewriting Adventure Comics #247 - it just hasn't been spelled out, so that nobody knows exactly what happened and when. Others, like Matthew E, who know a lot more about the Pre-Crisis continuity have spelled out various things that can't have happened in Johns' Legion at length, but there's still ambiguity even in things there probably shouldn't be like the mysterious and unique absence of Chemical King from historical lineups of Johns' Legion, and whether Star Boy was ever readmitted or not. It's just that, at this point, a lot of Ye Olde Fans - like you, it seems - will take that half-a-loaf and scoff it like there's no tomorrow (in your case, because it's a continuity where Kal-El's been a member). I'm willing to bet those selfsame people would have given exactly the same story/history a frostier reception in 1994, being as it is a bigger divergence than the Pocket Universe years.
|
|
|
|
Forums14
Topics21,065
Posts1,050,212
Legionnaires1,731
| |
Most Online53,886
Jan 7th, 2024
|
|
|
Posts: 26
Joined: July 2004
|
|
|
|
