0 members (),
52
Murran Spies, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Previous Thread |
|
Next Thread
|
|
Who's Who Omnibus!
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 40,648
Trap Timer
|
OP
Trap Timer
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 40,648 |
|
|
|
Re: Who's Who Omnibus!
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 9,466
Wanderer
|
Wanderer
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 9,466 |
I would have been more excited for this before DC decided continuity was optional. It was a great reference guide for the immediate post-Crisis universe for about a dozen years, but since then, the information contained within has been practically useless.
Last edited by Chaim Mattis Keller; 07/15/20 12:36 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Who's Who Omnibus!
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 29,248
Time Trapper
|
Time Trapper
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 29,248 |
Between the two, I normally prefer Marvel's Official Handbook because the info (after the first couple of issues, at least) was so comprehensive comparatively. But the artwork in Who-Who, with each entry getting a lovely pastiche, was superior. I think the loose-leaf notebook approach in Who's Who's final (?) incarnation was the most superior version of the format done by either company, but it was sadly short-lived. Not sure if I'm gonna get this omnibus. My concerns mirror Chaim's slightly, but at the same time, I do love the old continuities and would certainly find much delight within. We'll see...
Still "Lardy" to my friends!
|
|
|
Re: Who's Who Omnibus!
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 9,466
Wanderer
|
Wanderer
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 9,466 |
I agree that the loose-leaf Who's Who was the best. Brilliant design, fantastic artwork. Shame they didn't keep it going.
|
|
|
Re: Who's Who Omnibus!
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 40,648
Trap Timer
|
OP
Trap Timer
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 40,648 |
For me it's mostly the nostalgia value of it, than its actual value as a reference work.
What's most bizarre about the original series is that it ran concurrently with Crisis, so it's really this bizarre mix of pre-Crisis and post-Crisis continuity.
|
|
|
Re: Who's Who Omnibus!
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 9,466
Wanderer
|
Wanderer
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 9,466 |
Actually, that made a lot of sense, because Crisis was packed full of characters that readers wouldn't recognize. It would have been smart for them to have started it the year before or to have printed it bi-weekly (don't know how possible that was back then, given how distribution was through different channels) so that it concluded before the end of Crisis.
|
|
|
Re: Who's Who Omnibus!
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 40,648
Trap Timer
|
OP
Trap Timer
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 40,648 |
Yeah, it would've made a lot of sense if the main body of Who's Who had all been released prior to end of Crisis, and served as a guide to pre-Crisis continuity, and then the supplemental volumes detailed some of the post-Crisis changes. As it was, you get, notoriously, tons of entries on pre-Crisis Superman stuff, but then the main Superman entry is the post-Crisis version. It's just bizarre.
|
|
|
Re: Who's Who Omnibus!
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,095
Legionnaire!
|
Legionnaire!
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,095 |
This is really nice! I like the artwork and information in the issues I read. It would be nice to have the complete collection to review with friends.
Go with the good and you'll be like them; go with the evil and you'll be worse than them.- Portuguese Proverb
|
|
|
Re: Who's Who Omnibus!
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 76
Substitute
|
Substitute
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 76 |
This was a great series however I feel they messed up towards the end by dropping entries like Superboy due to changes after Crisis.
|
|
|
Forums14
Topics21,065
Posts1,050,207
Legionnaires1,731
|
Most Online53,886 Jan 7th, 2024
|
|
Posts: 107
Joined: August 2003
|
|
|
|