1 Legionnaires (Korbal, Korbal, Korbal),
21
Murran Spies, and
11
Spider Guild Agents. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Previous Thread |
|
Next Thread
|
|
Print Thread |
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 689
Active
|
Active
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 689 |
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060824/ap_on_sc/planet_mutiny_9 Quoting from the article, these are the new rules for determining a true planet: "a celestial body that is in orbit around the sun, has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a ... nearly round shape, and has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,194
#deleteFacebook
|
#deleteFacebook
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,194 |
Except stuff orbiting themselves (i.e. moons), of course on the last. And that they must primarily orbit the Sun rather than another planet (i.e., not moons ). And finally. I was scared that they were going to go through with the "12 planets" crap from last week. I did an astronomy course in first year, and the lecturers were very clear about Eight Planets, and when you look into it, Pluto never really made sense (it was originally thought to be bigger than Neptune, and when they officially "Made it a Planet", they still thought it was three or so times bigger than it is.)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,611
Legionnaire!
|
Legionnaire!
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,611 |
As long as we don't lose Uranus!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 689
Active
|
Active
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 689 |
No, that planet's safe. It's Pluto's overlapping orbit that disqualified it from full planetary status.
Though I do recall there was some talk of going back to the Greek version of the name and calling the planet Ouranos instead of Uranus. But I guess they dropped that idea?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,611
Legionnaire!
|
Legionnaire!
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,611 |
Originally posted by Seth Gaterra: No, that planet's safe. It's Pluto's overlapping orbit that disqualified it from full planetary status. and its size relative to Charon.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 40,770
Trap Timer
|
Trap Timer
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 40,770 |
This whole debate on what is/isn't a planet is rather silly. It's really an arbritrary classification, and, if one looks at the history of the matter, it's often had a lot more to do with politics than with anything that's actually scientifically significant.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,611
Legionnaire!
|
Legionnaire!
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,611 |
Perhaps we should investigate references to nine planets in the Legion to see how the matter is ultimately resolved.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 40,770
Trap Timer
|
Trap Timer
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 40,770 |
Hmm... did Superboy eat ice cream from Pluto?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 395
Active
|
Active
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 395 |
Well considering the fact that Pluto is smaller than our moon, you kind of had to know it was just a matterof time.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,274
Time Trapper
|
Time Trapper
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,274 |
Originally posted by Eryk Davis Ester: Hmm... did Superboy eat ice cream from Pluto? Nope. Both he and Supergirl ate Martian ice cream.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 57,030
strange but not a stranger
|
strange but not a stranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 57,030 |
But it was at the nine planets ice cream shoppe.
I think that the general public will still call Pluto a planet.
Big Dog! Big Dog! Bow Wow Wow!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,493
Leader
|
Leader
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,493 |
"I think that the general public will still call Pluto a planet."
I think you're giving them too much credit...
"Pluto's LOST? Does Micky Mouse know about it yet?"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 22,670
Fabulous and Sparkly!
|
Fabulous and Sparkly!
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 22,670 |
Hmmm...
My Very Educated Mother Just Served Us...Nothing???
The only character in all of literature who has been described as "badnass" while using the phrase "vile miscreant."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 24,141
Not much between despair and ecstacy
|
Not much between despair and ecstacy
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 24,141 |
Another mnemonic device shot to crap:
My Very Erotic Mate Joyfully Satisfies Unusual Needs ...
(What's missing here is Passionately.)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,430
Wanderer
|
Wanderer
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,430 |
actually, Pluto just was discovered to have three moons, instead of one - yes three moons orbiting Pluto. so it is still considered as a planet because it orbits the Sun and three moons revolving Pluto! Once it was thought to be a "double planet" because of Charon's size and Pluto's size being so similar to each other and their erratic revolution.
I believe that they named two new moons - Hydea and Nyx. Correct me if I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,430
Wanderer
|
Wanderer
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,430 |
all that debate...*sigh*...politics and I give up.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 12,862
Time Trapper
|
Time Trapper
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 12,862 |
I will never give up pluto...NEVAH!
Damn you, you kids! Get off my lawn or I'm callin' tha cops!
Something pithy!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,274
Time Trapper
|
Time Trapper
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,274 |
They had a story on the local news last night (which I'm sure was done by just about every major city) on how the planetarium in SLC now has to spend thousands of dollars updating their displays and films to change all references to Pluto being a planet.
I say send the bill to these educated dolts who just wanted to get their name in the press. If they wanted to change the definition, fine. But what's wrong with giving one exception to a celestial body that's been part of the solar system for 76 years? It isn't like the moons of Jupiter would complain.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 34,634
Bold Flavors
|
Bold Flavors
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 34,634 |
I find this all quite fascinating, although I really don't have an invested interest in Pluto's status. Originally posted by Lad Boy: As long as we don't lose Uranus! This quote made this thread for me
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 395
Active
|
Active
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 395 |
Well Ceres was demoted in the 19th century to asteroid, so it's not like it hasn't been done before. <shrug>
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 395
Active
|
Active
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 395 |
Originally posted by superboymddjr: I believe that they named two new moons - Hydea and Nyx. Correct me if I am wrong. Hmmm... I didn't think the two moons discovered by the Hubble had been named yet, what little I've read of them hasn't given them any official names, but I could have been reading dated material, or if could be that they're unofficial nicknames similar to Xena.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,274
Time Trapper
|
Time Trapper
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,274 |
Originally posted by Bubble Wrap Boy: Originally posted by superboymddjr: [b] I believe that they named two new moons - Hydea and Nyx. Correct me if I am wrong. Hmmm... I didn't think the two moons discovered by the Hubble had been named yet, what little I've read of them hasn't given them any official names, but I could have been reading dated material, or if could be that they're unofficial nicknames similar to Xena.[/b]If you want to believe Wikipedia: Nix and Hydra
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 689
Active
|
Active
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 689 |
What's happened is this. The International Astronomical Union has finally settled on rules for what makes a true planet; because of its orbital path, Pluto doesn't fit all three qualifications.
However, Pluto will be redefined as a "dwarf planet". And that's the category where they'll put Ceres and 2003 UB313 (aka "Xena").
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 395
Active
|
Active
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 395 |
QUOTE]If you want to believe Wikipedia: Nix and Hydra [/QB][/QUOTE] AWESOME thanks! One of my friends was actually in Prague voting. He was totally appalled by the whole 12 planet push, so I know he's happy.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 24,141
Not much between despair and ecstacy
|
Not much between despair and ecstacy
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 24,141 |
Originally posted by Lightning Lad: I say send the bill to these educated dolts who just wanted to get their name in the press. If they wanted to change the definition, fine. But what's wrong with giving one exception to a celestial body that's been part of the solar system for 76 years? It isn't like the moons of Jupiter would complain. No, but the rings of Saturn have been furious. Life goes on. There are exactly the same number of heavenly bodies in the solar system as there were before, whatever we choose to call them. This issue has all the importance and urgency of deciding exactly when the 21st century began -- 2000 or 2001 -- and will be remembered with just as much fanfare. :rolleyes:
|
|
|
Forums14
Topics21,086
Posts1,051,554
Legionnaires1,732
|
Most Online53,886 Jan 7th, 2024
|
|
Posts: 60
Joined: July 2003
|
|
|
|