posted
IF season three takes place in the prison, you'd figure that they'd make more than 13 episodes, given these ratings.
I mean, once you've built a prison set, you're going to want to get the use of it. At that point, it becomes the same as any other fixed set show. Your costs are amortized!
posted
I didn't think they'd get to Hershel's farm so quickly! I kinda doubt they can milk that setting for all the remaining S2 eps. In fact I kinda hope they don't. Interesting, though, that some of the scenes I've seen for the next episode show Shane in an urban-looking setting.
-------------------- "Suck it, depressos!"--M. Lash
From: The Underbelly of Society | Registered: Jul 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I think Shane will be on his own at some point soon. Remember the scene in the S2 trailer where he is running from zombies (and takes a scary tumble)... I kinda hate to see him split off from the group.
posted
Well, it certainly fits with what he and Andrea talked about. From what I saw on the "Talking Dead" after-show, that scene (or something similar) takes place next episode.
-------------------- "Suck it, depressos!"--M. Lash
From: The Underbelly of Society | Registered: Jul 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Glen Cadigan: IF season three takes place in the prison, you'd figure that they'd make more than 13 episodes, given these ratings.
I mean, once you've built a prison set, you're going to want to get the use of it. At that point, it becomes the same as any other fixed set show. Your costs are amortized!
I doubt they'll have to 'build' a prison set. 'Redress' one of the many existing ones at worst, or use a real (abandoned) prison for the scenes. Still, would like to see it play out a bit longer than 6-13 episodes.
From: gone | Registered: Jul 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Lard Lad: [QB]I didn't think they'd get to Hershel's farm so quickly!QB]
Really? It is a completely different reality than the comics now and can borrow storyline from practically anywhere in the series. I am not surprised that they are using a fairly dramatic story early in the season. Not really surprised about the differrence in Shane's role/destiny eaither. Dissapointed, but not surprised.
From: gone | Registered: Jul 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by LASHbrain: I think Shane will be on his own at some point soon. Remember the scene in the S2 trailer where he is running from zombies (and takes a scary tumble)... I kinda hate to see him split off from the group.
I have to admit that I was sort of surprised to find that 'Shane' had developed a bit of a fan base. I had to stop and think about it and realized that I am highly biased in this situation... I don't care for the character (tv or Comic) and I dispise the actor. I guess that lacking either of those opinions, it would be fairly easy to like 'Shane' (depite him being an opportunistic creep and a would-be rapist) as portrayed in the television series?
From: gone | Registered: Jul 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
ASIDE: As I refuse to compare the TV show and comic any longer, I shan't speak of comic Shane here.
Shane does have his good qualities and bad, like anyone. He was also the saviour and protector of Lori and Carl before Rick-- who he had no idea was alive once the hospital machines failed-- returned.
There's a lot more there than that, to my eyes. Your vision may vary.
Maybe Shane and Andrea will hook up. Maybe they both can help each other heal.
He's flawed, but he does have good points ... and it turns out that he was RIGHT.
Going to the CDC did nothing for the group (other than let them know there was no one coming to help them) and cost them at least one member of their group.
Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Interestingly, this episode seems to show that, contrary to the comic, natural (non-zombie bite) deaths do NOT begat zombies. All those bodies on the freeway would seem to be confirmation.
-------------------- "Suck it, depressos!"--M. Lash
From: The Underbelly of Society | Registered: Jul 2003
| IP: Logged |