quote:Originally posted by Bicycle Repair Man: Kinetix (unless you consider her the reboot version of Quislet )
Actually, I believe that she was intended to be the reboot Life Lass. Note that even the few glimpses we have seen postboot of the Lallorian heroes, Life Lass has never been seen.
Jeepers! How many times to we have to go through this!
Kinetix was clearly intended as a postboot Cera Kesh! Not Quislet! Not Life Lass!
Did Life Lass have a connection to the Emerald Eye? No! Was Life Lass telekinetic? No! She "animated" objects, presumably by transfering part of her own lifeforce to them. Similarly, Quislet "possessed" objects; it wasn't telekinetc.
Sheesh!
Well, the "wink" was meant to indicate that I don't take this particular hypothesis too seriously, and I don't expect anyone else to, either. It's just that I still recall the stunned amazement I felt when I finally noticed the simiarities between Zoe and Quislet, not to mention the embarassment that it had taken so bloody long (over a year) for me to connect the two.
How could make light of such an important issue!
Seriously, I think most "x" is a reboot "y" debates are pretty silly, myself. I'm not even clear what it's supposed to mean. Just because a character is introduced in the current version of the Legion that has a somewhat similar power to someone who existed in a previous version, how does that the new character a new "version" of the old? There's no more connection between Shikari and Dawnstar or between Kinetix, Life Lass, and Quislet or whoever than there was between Invisible Kids I and II in the preboot (and less, in fact, since Lyle and Jacques at least shared a name).
That would be almost entirely correct except for the fact that, um.... you're wrong.
From: Sumner, ME | Registered: Jul 2003
| IP: Logged |
Hyperpath: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic | Subscribe To Topic
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
) ![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
